Photo: Peter Riddersborg
Prize winner Enzensberger at the ceremony
With a broadside at the democratic deficits of European institutions, prize winner Hans Magnus Enzensberger lived up to his hard hitting reputation.
Fellow German thinker Jürgen Habermas once said, that Enzensberger has his »nose in the air,« by which he meant an acute sense of trends in the present time and epoch. At the Sonning Prize ceremony in the Ceremonial Hall at the University of Copenhagen Tuesday, Enzensberger was true to his form.
The Brussels bureaucracy is an authority that claims to want the best for us, he said.
»But instead it sees us as helpless minors without consent, as subjects that have to be convinced,« he said in his acceptance speech - a biting satire against the attempts by eurocrats to sidetrack a better European democracy.
»Every criticism of European institutions is conceived by these people as somehow anti-European,« Enzensberger said. It reminded him of the discourse of McCarthyism in the United States where all criticism was labelled Un-American.
Europeans can proudly look back at more than six decades without major wars, and the modern freedom from travelling restrictions within the EU has been an immense boon to personal freedom, Hans Magnus Enzensberger allowed.
But led by the Council of Ministers and the EU Commission, European institutions consistently lead a secretive, cabinet-style of politics where all decisions are made behind closed doors. Only experts can find their way through the EU jungle of institutions.
»To the executive arm of government this is a state of paradise,« he said.
A paradise where any call for bringing a policy up for referendum sends Eurocrats into a state of panic.
Citing philosopher Odo Marquard, Enzensberger said that European institutions live up to a twisted version of an old dictum.
»It is not about changing the world, but about beautifying it.«
As a thinker Enzensberger is not only known for his biting irony. Also his poetry, itself a reflection and criticism of social life and affairs, was praised at the ceremony, which included an 'a capella' choir and the presence of several key government ministers and literary celebrities.
His poem ‘Prozession’ was made into a haunting, multi-layered whispering by the chamber choir Camerata – while another poem ‘Mund’ was mouthed, and almost tasted, in the choir’s subtle rendering of Bent Lorentzen’s setting of Enzensberger's poems to music.
University of Copenhagen Rector Ralf Hemmingsen started the ceremony by praising Enzensberger for his »unavoidable criticism of the institutions of society«.
Keynote speaker, the literature professor emeritus Thomas Bredsdorff, pointed to Enzensberger's recent analysis of the European historical roots of Islamic terror, including his concept of ‘the radical loser’.
... and the Commission could do with being appointed by the directly elected, supranational Parliament rather than the indirectly elected and intergovernmental Council.
But as long as the power to propose treaties is vested in the Council, and as long as the national electorates continue to send small-minded, parochial conservatives like PiS and UMP to the Council, well...
On plebiscites, however, he's off his rocker.
The problem with plebiscites, and the reason the eurocrats are so deathly afraid of them, is that most decisions require unanimity among the member states. The EU is still at this point in time an intergovernmental construct rather than a true federation.
Unanimity requirements are great when it comes to enforcing consensus-based decisionmaking (which historically was one of the major points of the Union), but it also means that opponents to a proposal only have to defeat it in one (1) country in order to defeat it in every country. And it doesn't matter whether this country is Malta, Luxembourg or Germany.
If the referendum rules were changed so passing a referendum required simply a qualified double majority rather than the current mess, then opposition to referenda could be called anti-democratic (given a certain understanding of democracy, which is not universally accepted but to which I happen to subscribe).
As an aside, what we have now is not actually real unanimity - it's a form of first-past-the-post unanimity, which gives you the worst of both worlds: All the sluggishness of unanimity requirements and all the gerrymandering and other pseudodemocratic antics of FPTP systems.
Following the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day, Anna Prokop reflects on how far feminism has come. There is still an ‘untapped gold mine’ of potential in women, she says.
Project 25x7
Zoological information in non-zoological texts
Beer and boardgames at political science camp
Glitzy guerilla dining
Wednesday is International Night at the Student Café
Pissing on Panum: The whimsical world of campus art
Copenhagen: I never saw that before! Winners and the best of the rest
Twilight Christmas - our Advent Calendar
Termites hard at work
International students explore the suburbs
Whales hang out in parking lot
Gollums Column Official celebrations of the Bologna process in March are seen as a travesty by students and scholars
Write us an e-mail: uni-avis@adm.ku.dk
Copyright 2009 © Universitetsavisen.ku.dk