German sharpshooter targets bureaucrats

02/02-10 kl. 17:47 Culture
Sonningprisen_2010 Peter Riddersborg eng Photo: Peter Riddersborg Prize winner Enzensberger at the ceremony

Hans Magnus Enzensberger used his Sonning Prize acceptance speech to lash out against European institutions

by Mike Young

With a broadside at the democratic deficits of European institutions, prize winner Hans Magnus Enzensberger lived up to his hard hitting reputation.

Fellow German thinker Jürgen Habermas once said, that Enzensberger has his »nose in the air,« by which he meant an acute sense of trends in the present time and epoch. At the Sonning Prize ceremony in the Ceremonial Hall at the University of Copenhagen Tuesday, Enzensberger was true to his form.

The Brussels bureaucracy is an authority that claims to want the best for us, he said.

»But instead it sees us as helpless minors without consent, as subjects that have to be convinced,« he said in his acceptance speech - a biting satire against the attempts by eurocrats to sidetrack a better European democracy.

»Every criticism of European institutions is conceived by these people as somehow anti-European,« Enzensberger said. It reminded him of the discourse of McCarthyism in the United States where all criticism was labelled Un-American.

State of paradise

Europeans can proudly look back at more than six decades without major wars, and the modern freedom from travelling restrictions within the EU has been an immense boon to personal freedom, Hans Magnus Enzensberger allowed.

But led by the Council of Ministers and the EU Commission, European institutions consistently lead a secretive, cabinet-style of politics where all decisions are made behind closed doors. Only experts can find their way through the EU jungle of institutions.

»To the executive arm of government this is a state of paradise,« he said.

Not about changing the world…

A paradise where any call for bringing a policy up for referendum sends Eurocrats into a state of panic.

Citing philosopher Odo Marquard, Enzensberger said that European institutions live up to a twisted version of an old dictum.

»It is not about changing the world, but about beautifying it.«

Radical loser

As a thinker Enzensberger is not only known for his biting irony. Also his poetry, itself a reflection and criticism of social life and affairs, was praised at the ceremony, which included an 'a capella' choir and the presence of several key government ministers and literary celebrities.

His poem ‘Prozession’ was made into a haunting, multi-layered whispering by the chamber choir Camerata – while another poem ‘Mund’ was mouthed, and almost tasted, in the choir’s subtle rendering of Bent Lorentzen’s setting of Enzensberger's poems to music.

University of Copenhagen Rector Ralf Hemmingsen started the ceremony by praising Enzensberger for his »unavoidable criticism of the institutions of society«.

Keynote speaker, the literature professor emeritus Thomas Bredsdorff, pointed to Enzensberger's recent analysis of the European historical roots of Islamic terror, including his concept of ‘the radical loser’.

miy@adm.ku.dk

1 comment

Write a comment

03/02-10 kl. 01:45 J. Stenfalk:

... and the Commission could do with being appointed by the directly elected, supranational Parliament rather than the indirectly elected and intergovernmental Council.

But as long as the power to propose treaties is vested in the Council, and as long as the national electorates continue to send small-minded, parochial conservatives like PiS and UMP to the Council, well...

On plebiscites, however, he's off his rocker.

The problem with plebiscites, and the reason the eurocrats are so deathly afraid of them, is that most decisions require unanimity among the member states. The EU is still at this point in time an intergovernmental construct rather than a true federation.

Unanimity requirements are great when it comes to enforcing consensus-based decisionmaking (which historically was one of the major points of the Union), but it also means that opponents to a proposal only have to defeat it in one (1) country in order to defeat it in every country. And it doesn't matter whether this country is Malta, Luxembourg or Germany.

If the referendum rules were changed so passing a referendum required simply a qualified double majority rather than the current mess, then opposition to referenda could be called anti-democratic (given a certain understanding of democracy, which is not universally accepted but to which I happen to subscribe).

As an aside, what we have now is not actually real unanimity - it's a form of first-past-the-post unanimity, which gives you the worst of both worlds: All the sluggishness of unanimity requirements and all the gerrymandering and other pseudodemocratic antics of FPTP systems.

Join the debate read rules for debate here.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
AnnasExperiment
23/05-12 kl. 06:00 Culture

Photo Competition: Show us your room

Last chance! Send us a photo of your room before tonight at 24:00 and win tickets to the NorthSide Festival

braindrainorgane
22/05-12 kl. 06:00 World

Study shows where brains drain, or gain

A new study shows where scientists migrate to, and why. For foreign scientists in Denmark the main motivators are careers and prestige

See also:
Best and brightest consider leaving – for good
Universities struggle in ‘brain game’
raftillustration
20/05-12 kl. 06:00 Culture

The experts: How to make your own job

Entrepreneurship is a field filled with myths: One of them is that it is hard to start up something on your own. The experts have offered to share their tips

See also:
Crisis, what crisis? More student start-ups
Innovator: Don’t be afraid to fail
gregoryrockson
20/05-12 kl. 06:00 Campus

Innovator: Don’t be afraid to fail

In 2011, Gregory and two friends started the ‘Copenhagen Union’. Deliberately unambitious at the start, the initiative now trains students and organizes high-profile debates

See also:
The experts: How to make your own job
Crisis, what crisis? More student start-ups
studentstartups
19/05-12 kl. 06:00 Education

Crisis, what crisis? More student start-ups

Data shows that students are using the recession as an opportunity. More are starting businesses

spoiltstudent
18/05-12 kl. 10:00 Politics

Danish business: Students are spoilt rotten

We are dirt poor, claims Danish Student Council. Nonsense, says Chamber of Commerce, that calls for a halt to excessive student ‘salaries’

See also:
Only money for cheap champagne

Subscribe to newsletter

Are Danish students spoilt?

Unskilled jobs: 10 pros and cons

You’ve graduated from uni and you can’t get a job. The local job centre tells you to work in a pizzeria or at the local supermarket. But is it a good move to do what they say? Here’s a qualified list of pros and cons from an expert


Kontakt redaktionen

Write us an e-mail: uni-avis@adm.ku.dk

University of Copenhagen
Nørregade 10
1165 Copenhagen K
Denmark
Tel. +45 35 32 28 98

Copyright 2009 © Universitetsavisen.ku.dk