Photo: Polfoto
The majority of muslim women in Denmark who cover their face and body with the niqab are Danish converts, according to the controversial burka report.
»It is lousy and completely unreliable,« concluded Pia Kjærsgaard, the moment the most discussed piece of scientific research, the so-called 'burqa report', was presented to the public.
Pia Kjærsgaard was first and foremost critical of the researchers’ methods, as they had, among others, interviewed imams from the largest cities in Denmark.
As well as criticising the report’s scientific validity, the leader of Dansk Folkeparti also launched a direct attack against its authors:
»I am considering reporting the researchers to the UVVU (Committee of Scientific Fraud, ed.). It is so far-fetched.«
Pia Kjærsgaard is welcome to do just that, says Head of Department Ingolf Thuesen, who accepted the commission to compile the report, on behalf of the Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies at the University of Copenhagen. The report was commissioned by the government’s so-called ‘Burqa Committee’.
»I hope she reports us for poor scientific method. Then we can settle the case, instead of just leaving it at empty threats. The research our employees have conducted is beyond reproach,« says Ingolf Thuesen to the Post’s Danish sister site, Universitetsavisen.
Pia Kjærsgaard and Naser Khader have criticised researchers for contacting Abdul Wahid-Petersen and Abu Bashar, as well as the Islamic group Islamisk Trossamfund, whom Pia Kjærsgaard has dubbed »extremists«.
Professor Margit Warburg, who led the group of researchers responsible for the report, dismissed the criticism. She feels that leaving the imams out of the report would have been a mistake:
»It would have been bad scientific method, if we had not asked everyone who comes into contact with the women who wear niqab.«
Furthermore, the Burqa Commission requested that the researchers involve representatives from the Islamic community. The researchers have simply followed the project description requested by the governements own committee.
In this description, it is made clear that the researchers should aim to provide information »based on evaluations by various experts and/or individuals from the respective communities.«
In the note, it is stated that the evaluation should not be based on a »systematic count,« according to the Danish Daily Jyllands posten.
In the research community, the report has been met with mixed reactions. Some colleagues from Odense and Aarhus are unconvinced by the scientific methods used.
»I am definitely not very impressed by the choice of sources, which is characterised by its haphazardness,« says Mehdi Mozaffari, head of the Centre for Studies in Islamism and Radicalisation at Aarhus University, to the Danish newspaper, Information.
Islam expert Torben Rugberg Rasmussen from the University of Southern Denmark, agrees:
»A number of the sources, that the researchers contacted, may have been interested in minimizing the burqa issue, not least because of the government’s intended use of the report,« he says.
However, experts in scientific theory say that the researchers have done a respectable job.
Torben E. Andreasen, a researcher of scientific theory and method at Aarhus University, says that is makes good sense to interview representatives from the Islamic community.
He says, in an interview with science news website videnskab.dk, that the criticism of University of Copenhagen researchers is political:
»When researchers are publically accused in this way, for this kind of work, it seems to me that it must be politically motivated. A very large number of scientists could be accused of having results that are perhaps not quite correct.«
He adds that he has not heard any concrete arguments for why the scientific method in the report are worse than those used in any number of other research projects.
You’ve graduated from uni and you can’t get a job. The local job centre tells you to work in a pizzeria or at the local supermarket. But is it a good move to do what they say? Here’s a qualified list of pros and cons from an expert
Gallery: International Fascination of Plants Day
Graphic: Where are the jobs in Europe?
Gallery: Life revue '12
Gallery: Physics Revue '12
Gallery: Canada students’ protest
Gallery: USG Dance show
Gallery: Party Watch, CSS Year Party '12
Gallery: War of the Wardrobes, Black Diamond, Copenhagen
Gallery: Spiders at the Zoological Museum
Gallery: Stars with Brains 2012 challenge
Gallery: Royal opening of 'Day of Research' 2012
Gallery: War of the Wardrobes, Luxembourg Gardens, Paris
Gallery: Taking hair sample from Egtved girl
Gallery: Fieldwork in Disko Bay, Greenland
Gallery: Research project is last hope for Danish ash trees
Gallery: Follow Marte's free work-out
Graphic: When do European students leave home?
Graphic: Dissatisfied European students
Gallery: War of the Wardrobes, Karolinska, Stockholm
War of the Wardrobes: Copenhagen art event Send us a photo of your room and win tickets to the NorthSide Festival
Write us an e-mail: uni-avis@adm.ku.dk
Copyright 2009 © Universitetsavisen.ku.dk